Skip to main content

What you need to know about Gross Merchandise Value


Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) is defined as the gross sales revenue generated over a period of time by an e-commerce platform before any deduction for fees or commission . It is used to track the growth rate of an e-commerce business since it measures the value of the total merchandise that has been sold through the site for a specific time period, quarterly, bi-annually, or annually.

Gross Merchandise Value = Number of Goods sold x Price of goods sold

This metric is useful for e-commerce businesses that buy and store the merchandise from suppliers and delivers to customers when purchases are made. However, it cannot be used as a standalone metric for all online retail platforms. For e-commerce sites that operate as a Customer-to-Customer (C2C) business, they do not physically manage the goods. The total commissions generated and accrued expenses, such as delivery fees, advertising, return expenses incurred are more important to track for this business model. This is also known as Gross Transaction Value (GTV). GMV is the total marketplace value that the e-commerce site has created whereas GTV is the revenue that the business generated for itself from running the marketplace. For example, GMV may increase from quarter to quarter for an e-commerce business, but if GTV remained constant or fell as a proportion to GMV, it means that the business is not really extracting more value from the transactions that take place on its platform. GTV/GMV is a metric that is preferred over GMV because the stakeholders of the business can analyze the earnings that e-commerce business is generating from hosting customer-to-customer transactions on its site. 

Amazon and Alibaba illustrate two types of e-commerce business models and how GMV would differ for the two. Amazon is essentially a reseller, procuring and storing products and then delivering to customers. The company owns numerous warehouses and now has forayed into offline retail, with its acquisition of Whole Foods. The main sources of revenue for Amazon is from sales of electronic products and its member subscription services. It also generates revenue from facilitating third-party sales. Unlike Amazon, Alibaba does not own any warehouses and enables all sellers to directly connect and ship to customers. The commonality between the services are that they have their own payment structures and have dominated their respective home countries. Tracking GMV for Amazon and tracking GTV for Alibaba is the logical route. 

To put things in perspective, in 2018, Alibaba's GMV was around $768 billion while Amazon's GMV was $239 billion. GTVs of the companies are not given but it can be deduced that the GTV of Amazon would be higher than that of GTV of Alibaba given their respective business models.

Infographic by : www.channeladvisor.com

Despite Amazon charging its sellers higher fees and commissions, “the company’s profit margin (net income as a percentage of sales) is lower at 4.1% (as of 2019) versus 23.3% (fiscal 2019 ending March) for Alibaba .” This is primarily because of Amazon’s reseller business model which incurs higher overheads than Alibaba. It looks like Alibaba will certainly give Amazon a run for its money however Amazon has been differentiating itself by diversifying in its offerings and focusing on customer service through quality and quick delivery.

In conclusion, while GMV serves as a popular and useful metric to gauge the growth of e-commerce platforms, it is important to understand the type of business model the platform operates on and use it with other metrics to analyze growth opportunities and challenges the business site is facing or may face. 


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pros and Cons of Cash on Delivery payment in E-commerce!!!

Cash on Delivery payment in E-tailing is  the most preferred form of payment by the customers these days. Cash on Delivery option is not available in many countries. But some countries in Asia like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Thailand, Nepal etc. support Cash on Delivery option in E-tailing. These are the pros of Cash on Delivery payment: Cash on Delivery option is supported by many E-commerce sites in some countries of Asia, India being a part of it. Cash on Delivery (COD) is preferred by online buyers who would like to check the product before paying for it.  This is advantageous for the customers as they can check the product before paying for it. Another advantage of COD is that many people in rural areas of India and many other countries who do not have credit cards and debit cards can buy products online. COD is supported by many E-commerce sites to attract  online buyers who are not comfortable  to reveal their credit or debit card details online. Cons

5 Major challenges faced by e-Commerce sellers and ways to overcome it!

Based on a report by Google and Temasek Holdings, Southeast Asia’s (SEA) digital market could exceed US$200 billion before 2025. Southeast Asia’s digital economy is forecast to triple its size in the next 5 years. Read more on the challenges faced as a seller in the E-commerce marketplace, to help you decipher and be part of this immensely growing economy. E-commerce stores are on the rise due to a numerous reasons.  As far as market association is concerned, E-commerce sites already have an existing network of buyers. So, selling your products becomes relatively easy as branding and advertising is already taken care of.As  Sigmund Freud 's had rightly said  “ I carefully consider my decisions as everything comes with pros and cons! ”  Marketplace Management When it comes to South-East Asian E-commerce market, the most underestimated struggle is  Fragmentation  i.e. there are a number of e-commerce platforms in ASEAN countries attracting significant traffic, making

BE IN LOCAL, GO ON GLOBAL: How to be a local manufacturer and also be global online seller.

The Success of a Manufacturer depends on,  how well his products are purchased by the consumers. The timeline of international trade dates back to the Sumerian Era of Mesphotomien region (around 2000 to 3000 BCE) and then to the Chola Era of Southern India. If we delve deeper into it,  we see the Incense Trade Route is much older than the Silk Trade Route.  The  Incense trade route included a network of a major ancient land and sea trading routes linking the Mediterranean world with eastern and southern sources of incense, spice and other luxury goods (gold, silver, ivory and precious stones) stretching from Mediterranean ports across the Levant and Egypt through Northeastern Africa and Arabia to India and beyond. During the middle ages, the Silk Trade Route has been formed and trade has been established between the Greco-Roman empires with the Chinese and South Indian Kingdoms. After this, the trade has flourished in the early modern and the Later Moden periods betw